Looks like some interesting things happened at the JALC board meeting last night according to today's Southern Illinoisan. First Kilquist tried to postpone the vote on eliminating the clause in President Drieth's contract that would have allowed the board to get rid of him without cause at any time with a six-month buyout. Then Brewer asked to have it discussed in executive session. Jackie Hancock reminded them of the motion on the floor and the vote was taken with Brewer and Kilquist voting no and Rendleman voting yes "with some reservations."
So what does this mean? First, the shenanigans of the past didn't work – postponing votes until Attorney Huffman weighs in and trying to move public agenda items to executive session where Brewer can operate in secret. Second, Hancock, Sanders, and Hopkins all spoke up as they understood the original intent of the clause in Dreith's contract. Third, Rendleman was ….just being Rendleman. He saw the way the votes were going and tried to play it both ways. Fourth, this vote highlights why the elimination of O'Keefe was so important. And finally, it makes the Board accountable both fiscally and ethically. Yes, there may be times when a president should be removed but ONLY with cause and due process. Some board members can't just use taxpayer money for buyouts as a way to advance their personal agendas as we've seen in the past.
As board member Sanders said, this was a "prudent" decision and hopefully revealing of some new dynamics among the board members. And kudos to reporter Stephen Rickerl for his excellent coverage on this!