Unanswered question Number One

Listening to audio of last Tuesday night's candidate forum, it becomes obvious that some questions were not answered.  Candidate Mike Vanhorn raised the question, 'Why was Bill Kilquist present at the Board session, even if he didn't vote, when his candidacy for Director of Security was discussed?'

OK, there it is.  Maybe this is a multi-part question:

• What are the names of those who were present, at the Board meeting, when Bill Kilquist's hire as Director of Security was discussed?
• What exactly was discussed at that meeting?
• If Mr. Kilquist was present, why was he allowed to be?  Whose decision was it to allow him to remain?
• Was this discussed in executive session? 
• If so, why, if the candidate was present?
• Was the Open Meetings Act adhered to? 
• Were other candidates discussed at this session?
• Was there a predetermined candidate, and if so, did this violate Logan hiring practices?

Again, why was he present?  Two years later, this is still being asked in the halls of Logan, out in the district and now in the election.